Outwardly, I told my boy how grateful I was Behind every horse girl who believes in herself is a Grandma who believed in her first shirt that he’d filled the car’s tank, proud that he’d known when to ask for help, pleased that he’d learned how to jump an engine…while quietly cringing that he may have destroyed my only vehicle at a time when I could ill-afford to replace it. To maintain curiosity is not so difficult, because curiosity is a natural part of the human character while its inhibition, which usually happens in the school years, is the result of socialization and a poor educational environment. (Unfortunately, many public schools and many private schools are poor educational environments.) A curious person won’t be satisfied doing a dull job or living with an incurious person. So maintaining curiosity throughout life can come at the price of alienation from most conventional people. The risk of being considered an oddball accepted, here are two things parents can do. Failure needs to be de-stigmatized. We learn the important things through making mistakes and when you are at a more sophisticated level you make more sophisticated mistakes. Not trying is what should be stigmatized.
Behind every horse girl who believes in herself is a Grandma who believed in her first shirt, hoodie, ladies-tee, Tank top, sweater, and v-neck t-shirt
Best Behind every horse girl who believes in herself is a Grandma who believed in her first shirt
Failure is part of the game and failure can take you to Behind every horse girl who believes in herself is a Grandma who believed in her first shirt unintended but sometimes wonderful places. People learn in various ways, it’s true, but those who have been made to feel second-class because they did not at first succeed will tend to turn themselves off from learning. In school that usually means learning only what you need to learn to get the grades, as opposed to learning to discover and grow – which is what we should all want. Fearing failure can lead to habitual opting-out of the learning process. For who wants to be a failure? Plus, if learning is associated with simply memorization, repetition, and regurgitation, who would want to do any more of that than is necessary? In the latter instance, if you do more learning than is necessary, you are also a kind of loser. This is the idea that you need to get the learning over with to live a littl
This is something that is fun. You are taking back the fun that life has stolen from you. Often ‘A’ students are the Behind every horse girl who believes in herself is a Grandma who believed in her first shirt children who have conditioned themselves to be inured to tedium. Also, often ‘F’ students are only those students who can’t stand being bored. Obviously, both kinds of kids are at risk in terms of personal fulfillment. I don’t accept the idea that schooling and education are the same things. What many people consider a good school might actually be a toxic educational environment, even if the average student in this school achieves comparatively good grades on those dreadful multiple-choice, a bubble in, high stakes exams. For those who don’t know, government-schools in India represent the poverty-stricken sections, in the cities as well as in the rural areas, although obviously, the condition is much worse in the latter. Not only are these schools in a state that varies from poor to horrifically dilapidated, the kids who study here mostly come from the slums. These schools, these children, their homes, their families, their backgrounds for a rough idea of the picture think: Slumdog Millionaire. The point is, it is the really poor people that I am going to talk about. Including those who lie below the poverty line. You are completely right about the relationship between poverty and overpopulation.
It is cyclic, hence a doubly serious concern globally. Let me cut to the chase with the reasons on why poor people produce more children than they can afford to raise. I will try not to be country-specific, but most points may seem more relevant to developing countries, particularly India. Again a traditional attitude. They never tried to ask why is this more important than improving their own condition, why is it important at all. They never tried to understand the (lack of) logic behind it. What would their descendants do? Conquer the world? Run a family business? Make their name immortal? No. They would just make sure that they produce more generations of poorer, unhealthier, more unfortunate people. But no, the surname must live on. This is crucial in the entire scheme of things. For most poor people, a girl-child is still something to be ashamed of.